2020中国国际学校竞争力排行榜：深国交英国方向全国继续排名第1

京领作为高端国际化教育资源与服务平台，世界国际化学校排名评价、品牌传媒、科研教育推动者，持续、深入地对中国国际学校竞争力水平进行研究与分析，深度挖掘国际学校特色，优化评价标准，推动行业升级，促进国际化创新人才培养。

本届京领榜单发布会暨诺奖创新论坛上，在

诺贝尔经济学奖得主

诺贝尔生理学或医学奖得主

诺贝尔物理学奖得主

三位诺奖得主的见证下

京领重磅发布

2020中国国际学校竞争力排行榜

参与论坛的还有哈佛剑桥讲席教授、百余位北上广深等知名国际学校校长等嘉宾，这已经是京领连续第三年发布中国国际学校竞争力榜单，受到国际化教育领域的专家学者、校长和管理者、学生和家长的广泛关注。

由于美国本科与英国本科在学生录取评估上存在差异，“中国国际学校竞争力排行榜”分为美国本科方向榜单和英国本科方向榜单。

中国境内（除港澳台地区）应用国际高中课程，且学生以留学海外高等院校为目的的公办学校国际项目或国际部、民办学校以及外籍子女学校等。

所有数据来源于客观资料以及京领研究院独家数据，共计查询1258所国际学校官方网站、570所国际学校官方微信公众号，5个主流考试委员会授权机构官方网站以及7个主流教育认证机构官方网站。

具体数据来源主要有：

美国本科方向

认证竞争力指标包含“主流考试委员会授权机构认证”、“主流认证机构认证”两个二级指标。

主流考试委员会授权机构认证：

主流国际认证机构认证：

美国本科方向：

英国本科方向：

本榜单以可获得的客观数据和京领研究院独家数据为基础，从认证竞争力、师资竞争力和升学竞争力三个核心维度，进行量化建模、综合加权评分及评级。具体的指标权重体系如下：

美国本科方向：

英国本科方向：

本次榜单在进行评分及排名的基础上，对中国国际学校竞争力综合排名及三项一级指标进行评级。

其中，排名第1-3名对应“AAAAA”评级，排名第4-10名对应“AAAA”评级，排名第11-30名对应“AAA”评级，排名第31-50名对应“AA”评级，排名第51-100名对应“A”评级，排名第101-200名对应“200强”评级，排名第201-300名对应“300强”评级，排名第301-400名对应“400强”评级。

1.在进行排名时，21项指标每项得分最高的学校为100分，得分最低的学校为0分，其他学校按其与最高值和最低值的差值比例赋值。对学校在20项指标上的得分进行加权，令总得分最高的学校为100分，其它学校按其与最高值的比例得分。

2.学校在截止日期前尚未无客观2020届毕业生升学数据、客观的升学数据未说明年份、客观的数据为教育集团全体毕业生数据或者全部校区毕业生数据的，均不进入本次榜单排名计算。

3.由于每所学校客观数据标准不同或者公开程度不一，升学竞争力指标中的各学校学生进入读大学的入学人数按照以下方式统计：

（1）客观数据中有本校2020届毕业生中每位学生最终升学选择的，直接统计相应学校和人数；

（2）客观数据中仅有2020届学生收到录取通知的所有大学，但没有明确学生最终升学选择的，以各学生收到的录取中排名最高的大学为准；

（3）客观数据中仅有2020届学生收到的录取通知书总量，但没有明确学生最终升学选择的，则假设每个学生平均收到5份录取通知，按照每个大学录取通知书总量的五分之一统计，所得数据小于1的记为1 ；

（4）客观数据中仅有2020届学生录取大学列表，未明确说明学生最终选择或未明确说明各个大学的具体录取数量的，以每个大学发放1份录取通知书处理；

（5）客观数据中仅有2020届学生部分录取学校数据的，以学校客观数据为准；

（6）如在上述情况之外，出现学校客观的升学数据存在未标明年份、学校客观的升学数据为集团全部毕业生或者所有校区毕业生等情况的，均视为该学校数据缺失。

As an advanced and high-end platform of international educational recourses and services, and a promoter of international school ranking evaluation, brand media and scientific research education, KingLead has been conducting continuous and in-depth research and analysis on the competitiveness of international schools in China, deeply exploring the characteristics of international schools, in order to optimize evaluation standards, promote industrial upgrading and promote the cultivation of international innovative talents.

At KingLead International School Competitiveness Ranking Conference & Nobel Innovation Forum,

Witnessed by three Nobel Laureates,

Nobel Laureate in Economics

Nobel Laureate in Physiology or Medicine

Nobel Laureate in Physics

KingLead grandly released the 

2020  China International School Competitiveness Ranking

Chaired professors from Harvard University and Cambridge University and more than 100 international school headers from Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen also attended the event. KingLead International School Competitiveness Ranking Conference & Nobel Innovation Forum has received extensive attention from experts, scholars, school principles and  managers, students and parents in the field of international education.

Because there are differences in admission process between U.S. universities and U.K. universities, The China International School Competitiveness Ranking is divided into two directions, one is for enrollment to U.S. universities, another one is for enrollment to U.K. universities. 

The schools in China mainland (except Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan) which apply international high school courses and whose students are aiming at studying abroad.

All the data comes from objective data sources and exclusive data from KingLead Research Institute. There are 1258 official websites and 570 official WeChat subscriptions of international schools. 5 official websites of the examinations committee and 7 official websites of the certification Authority. 

The main data sources are as follows:

Based on available objective data and exclusive data from KingLead Research Institute, the ranking utilizes quantitative model and compositive weighted score to reflect international schools' comprehensive competitiveness from three core dimensions : International Certification, Faculty, and Enrollment to Universities.

This indicator includes two sub indicators: Certification by Mainstream Exam Committee, Certification by Mainstream Certification Authority.

Certification by Mainstream Exam Committee:

Certification by Mainstream Certification Authority:

There are 6 sub-indicators according to the rankings of the U.S. universities that students have enrolled. The rankings of U.S. universities used in this ranking refer to U.S. News Best National University Rankings.

There are 6 sub-indicators according to the rankings of the U.K. universities that students have enrolled. The rankings of U.K. universities used in this ranking refers to U.K. universities selected as TOP 100 in U.S. News  Best Global University Rankings.

Based on the score and ranking results, the competitiveness level of each school is rated as below:

The rankings 1-3 correspond to the "5A" rating, the 4-10 rankings correspond to the "4A" rating, the 11-30 rankings correspond to the "3A" rating, the 31-50 rankings correspond to the "2A" rating, ranking 51-100 corresponds to the "A" rating, ranking 101-200 corresponds to the "A" rating, ranking 201-300 corresponds to the " TOP300" rating，ranking 301-400 corresponds to the " TOP400" rating.

1. During the ranking process, for each of the 21 indicators, the school with the highest score is assigned with 100 points. Other schools are assigned values according to the ratio of the highest values for each indicator. Then, the school’s scores on 21 indicators are weighted, so that the school with the highest total score is 100 points, and the rest of schools score in proportion to the highest value.

2. Before the deadline, if a school’s objective data of college enrollment of Class of 2020 cannot be found, or its objective data doesn’t show which year it belongs to or which campus it belongs to, or its objective data is for the whole education group it belongs instead of this branch school to or all campuses including this branch school, this school is not included in the ranking.

3. Since every school has a different way of measuring objective data or describing data, each student’s enrollment result for the indicator of Enrollment to Universities is calculated as follows,

1) For the class of 2020, f a school’s objective data announces which university each student enters and who  the student is, this student and his/her enrollment result is counted for this school.

2) For the class of 2020, if a school’s objective data only announces each student’s all offers received and who  the student is, but doesn’t announce which university each student enters, the highest ranked university among offers received by each student is counted for this school.

3) For the class of 2020, If a school’s objective data only announces the total number of offers received by the whole class but doesn’t announce which university each student enters and who  the student is, then assuming that each student of this school receives 5 offers on average, one-fifth of the total numbers of offers from each university is counted for this school. The final number small than 1 is counted as 1.

4) For the class of 2020, if a school’s objective data only announces a list of the universities where the whole class has received offers but doesn’t announce which university each student enters and who  the student is, it is assumed that one student of this school enrolls one university in this list.

5) For the class of 2020, if a school’s objective data only announces the enrollment results of a part of Class of 2020, only the announced data are used.

6) In addition to the above situations, if a school's objective data doesn’t show which year it belongs to, or its objective data is for the whole education group it belongs to or is for all campuses including this branch school, then it is assumed that this school’s data for the indicator of Enrollment to Universities is missing.